Mexico’s Second Independence: A Vision for Economic Sovereignty and Technological Leadership in the 21st Century#

On Strategic Resource Development and National Transformation

Two centuries after José María Morelos y Pavón articulated his revolutionary vision in the “Sentimientos de la Nación,” Mexico stands at another crossroads that will determine whether the nation achieves true sovereignty or remains trapped in patterns of dependence that have constrained its potential since independence. The choice before Mexico today mirrors the fundamental challenge Morelos identified in 1813: the need for genuine independence that encompasses not merely political autonomy but economic transformation that serves the Mexican people rather than external powers.

The Contemporary Colonial Condition#

Mexico confronts what can only be described as a new form of colonialism—subtler than the Spanish dominion Morelos fought against, but no less constraining in its effects on national development and citizen welfare. The statistics reveal the depth of this contemporary dependence with stark clarity. Mexico’s export portfolio demonstrates extreme geographic concentration, with approximately 80% of exports ($455.3 billion) directed toward the United States as of 2023, while 50% of imports also originate from the US and Canada (Banco de México, 2023; MacroTrends, 2024). This concentration ratio significantly exceeds what trade economists consider the threshold for dangerous dependence (Hirschman, 1945), creating what dependency theorists term “structural heteronomy”—the inability to determine autonomous development paths due to external economic constraints (Evans, 1995).

The human cost of this dependence becomes evident when we examine Mexico’s institutional degradation. The 2024 Corruption Perceptions Index provides stark evidence of this decay, ranking Mexico 140th out of 180 countries with a score of 26 out of 100—the lowest in Mexico’s history and representing a 14-position decline from the previous year (Transparency International, 2024). Mexico now ranks as the most corrupt nation among all 38 OECD members and ahead of only Russia within the G20. Perhaps most troubling, 44% of surveyed citizens reported believing corruption increased in 2024, while 34% admitted to paying bribes to public officials (Baker McKenzie, 2024). The economic cost of this corruption and violence is estimated at approximately 1.4% of GDP annually, representing roughly $24 billion in lost economic output (Mexican Institute for Competitiveness, 2023).

This institutional capture creates what political economists term a “captured state” (Hellman et al., 2003), where criminal organizations and corrupt networks have penetrated governmental institutions to such an extent that state apparatus primarily serves private rather than public interests. For educated professionals, this degradation creates perverse incentive structures wherein cooperation with criminal networks often appears more economically rational than legitimate employment—a phenomenon Bates (2008) identifies as characteristic of “failed development” scenarios.

Yet Mexico’s situation differs fundamentally from Morelos’ era in one crucial respect: the contemporary global context presents unprecedented opportunities for strategic diversification and autonomous development that were impossible during the era of bipolar Cold War competition. The emergence of multiple growth poles—China, India, the European Union—creates space for middle powers to pursue what international relations scholars term “strategic hedging” (Kuik, 2008), allowing countries like Mexico to diversify partnerships and reduce dependence on any single power.

The Foundation for Transformation#

Mexico possesses objective advantages that many successful development cases lacked, beginning with substantial natural resource endowment that remains largely underdeveloped. The country’s critical mineral resources include estimated lithium reserves of 1.7 million tons with potential values reaching $600 billion in Sonora alone (Ministry of Finance, 2024). As the world’s largest silver producer (24% of global production), Mexico generated over $2.5 billion in silver mining investments in 2024 (Mining Journal, 2024). Mexico ranks among the top 10 global producers of 15+ metals and minerals, including 3% of global copper production, with major operations in Sonora, Zacatecas, and San Luis Potosí (CEPAL, 2024).

Perhaps even more significant is Mexico’s renewable energy potential, which exceeds 50,000 MW in solar capacity and 40,000 MW in wind potential, yet only 15% of electricity generation comes from renewable sources as of 2024 (SENER, 2024). Current geothermal installed capacity of 963 MW could potentially expand to over 13,000 MW given Mexico’s volcanic geography (International Renewable Energy Agency, 2024). This renewable energy potential, combined with critical mineral resources, positions Mexico to become a dominant force in the global energy transition while achieving the energy independence that has eluded the country since the decline of its oil reserves.

The geographic and demographic foundations for transformation are equally compelling. With a domestic market of 130 million consumers (GDP per capita of $13,926 in 2023) and strategic positioning between major economic blocs, Mexico enjoys advantages that successful development cases like South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore never possessed (World Bank, 2023). However, as Acemoglu & Robinson (2012) emphasize, favorable conditions are insufficient without appropriate institutional arrangements and political leadership capable of coordinating complex transformation processes.

A Vision Grounded in Historical Memory#

The framework for Mexico’s transformation must begin with the recognition that contemporary challenges structurally parallel those Morelos identified two centuries ago. Just as colonial New Spain suffered from institutional arrangements that served Spanish rather than Mexican interests, contemporary Mexico operates within economic structures that often prioritize external powers and internal criminal networks over national development and citizen welfare. Morelos' insight that “America is free and independent from Spain and any other nation, government or monarchy” remains unfulfilled in economic terms, as Mexico’s asymmetric dependence on the United States constrains autonomous development and exposes the nation to external manipulation (Morelos, 1813).

The “second independence” that Mexico requires must address the same fundamental principles Morelos articulated. His vision of “equality before the law” translates into inclusive growth strategies that provide legitimate economic opportunities for all citizens, thereby reducing incentives for cooperation with criminal networks. His emphasis on “work and good customs” aligns with innovation-driven development that rewards productive activity rather than rent-seeking behavior. Most fundamentally, his insistence on sovereignty “emanating from the people” requires economic structures that serve national rather than foreign interests (Morelos, 1813).

This historical foundation provides more than inspiration—it offers a template for understanding how transformative change occurs in Mexican society. Morelos succeeded not merely through military action but by articulating a comprehensive vision of social and economic transformation that provided concrete alternatives to colonial exploitation. Contemporary Mexico requires a similarly comprehensive approach that addresses both the symptoms of dependence (corruption, violence, poverty) and their structural causes (economic concentration, institutional capture, technological subordination).

The Chinese Model and Democratic Adaptation#

China’s transformation from an impoverished agricultural economy to the world’s second-largest economy and emerging technological superpower provides crucial lessons for Mexico’s development strategy, though these lessons must be adapted to Mexico’s democratic context and different geopolitical position. China’s three-phase development framework offers a template that Mexico can follow while avoiding the authoritarian governance that ultimately limits China’s soft power and long-term sustainability.

During China’s foundation-building phase (1978-1992), the “Reform and Opening Up” policy combined gradual market reforms with maintained state control, special economic zones that served as testing grounds for capitalism, and massive infrastructure investment. Mexico can adapt this approach by transforming each state into specialized economic zones based on natural resources and comparative advantages. Northern border zones would focus on manufacturing and technology integration with North America, central zones on advanced manufacturing and R&D centers, southern zones on renewable energy and agricultural technology hubs, and coastal zones on maritime technology and international trade centers.

China’s industrial upgrading phase (1992-2012) emphasized technology transfer requirements that forced foreign companies to share technology for market access, state-directed investment in strategic industries, and massive infrastructure expansion. Mexico’s adaptation of this approach would leverage the country’s existing automotive manufacturing base to move into electric vehicles and autonomous systems, develop renewable energy manufacturing to become a global supplier of solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries, and create agricultural technology capabilities for precision farming and food processing technology.

The contemporary Chinese innovation leadership phase (2012-present) focuses on indigenous innovation through massive R&D investment, digital economy development, and global infrastructure investment through the Belt and Road Initiative. Mexico’s “Made in Mexico 2030” strategy would emphasize technological leadership in renewable energy technology, agricultural innovation, mining technology, water technology, and space technology, while developing digital sovereignty through Mexican digital platforms, fintech innovation, cybersecurity industry, and AI capabilities leveraging renewable energy for competitive advantage.

However, Mexico’s democratic foundations provide distinct advantages that China lacks. As Sen (1999) demonstrates, democratic societies typically achieve more sustainable development outcomes than authoritarian alternatives due to superior feedback mechanisms and voluntary cooperation. Mexico can achieve rapid development while maintaining institutional legitimacy—an advantage that may prove decisive in long-term competition for regional leadership.

Economic Geography and State-by-State Transformation#

Mexico’s economic structure demonstrates significant concentration, with the top three economic entities—Mexico City (17.7% of GDP), Nuevo León (7.5%), and Jalisco (6.8%)—accounting for 32% of national economic output (INEGI, 2024). This concentration presents both opportunities for leveraging existing capabilities and challenges in addressing regional inequality that fuels migration and social instability. The transformation strategy must therefore address both the need to enhance existing centers of excellence and develop untapped potential in resource-rich states that currently contribute below their capacity to national economic output.

Sonora exemplifies the untapped potential that exists throughout Mexico. Currently contributing only 2.3% of national GDP ($39.1 billion) despite being Mexico’s leading mining state, Sonora possesses the resource endowment and strategic location to become a critical minerals and renewable energy hub. The state’s copper reserves, among the world’s largest, combined with lithium deposits valued at potentially $600 billion, provide the foundation for advanced metallurgy and battery manufacturing industries. The ongoing construction of the Puerto Peñasco Solar Plant ($1.6 billion investment for 1,000 MW capacity) demonstrates the state’s renewable energy potential, while its 1,000km border with the United States provides USMCA market access alongside opportunities for diversification through Asian partnerships.

The transformation of Sonora illustrates how strategic resource development can address multiple national challenges simultaneously. By establishing world-class technical institutes specializing in mining, renewable energy, and advanced manufacturing, the state can address the skills shortage that currently sees 60% of engineering graduates migrate to the US or Mexico City. Return migration programs offering competitive salaries and benefits can reverse brain drain while building the human capital necessary for technological advancement. Most importantly, by creating 60,000 direct jobs with average salaries of $45,000 USD annually, the transformation provides legitimate economic alternatives that make cooperation with criminal networks economically irrational.

Nuevo León demonstrates how existing industrial excellence can be leveraged for technological advancement. Contributing 7.5% of national GDP ($127.5 billion) with manufacturing representing 30% of state GDP, Nuevo León has established itself as Mexico’s industrial powerhouse through consistent foreign investment leadership over 20+ years. The state’s $4.16 billion automotive investment in 2024 across 22 projects, generating 110,000+ automotive jobs at salaries 2.5 times the national average, provides the foundation for electric vehicle transition and autonomous systems development. The expansion of the Monterrey Aerocluster from current 20 companies to 50+ by 2028, specializing in avionics and flight control systems, positions the state for aerospace technology leadership. By integrating these capabilities with digital economy expansion and Industry 4.0 implementation, Nuevo León can increase its GDP contribution from 7.5% to 10.2% by 2030 while generating 85,000 additional high-value jobs.

Jalisco’s evolution into Mexico’s technology capital demonstrates how cultural assets can be combined with technological advancement. Contributing 6.8% of national GDP ($115.6 billion) while hosting 40% of Mexico’s IT industry through 650+ specialized companies, Jalisco has earned recognition as the “Mexican Silicon Valley.” The state’s $42.5 billion in international sales (16.9% growth from 2023) and $890 million investment commitment from Silicon Valley companies for 2025 provide momentum for expansion. By increasing technology graduates from current 10,000 annually to 15,000 by 2028 and expanding electronics exports from $12.9 billion to $25 billion, Jalisco can become Latin America’s primary technology and innovation hub while preserving its cultural heritage in tequila and mariachi that provide global soft power.

International Partnership Strategy and Strategic Autonomy#

The contemporary geopolitical environment creates unprecedented opportunities for middle powers to pursue autonomous development strategies through diversified partnerships. The Trump administration’s deployment of tariff threats, immigration restrictions, and trade renegotiation as tools of coercion demonstrates the strategic vulnerability inherent in asymmetric dependence (Frieden, 2020), validating dependency theory predictions about core-periphery power dynamics (Dos Santos, 1970). However, the emergence of multiple growth poles enables Mexico to reduce this dependence while maintaining beneficial relationships.

The European Union offers technology transfer opportunities in renewable energy, automotive, and industrial technology, combined with €300+ billion Green Deal investments that create partnerships for clean energy development. Democratic values alignment provides shared commitment to rule of law and anti-corruption efforts, while market access to 450 million consumers with high purchasing power offers alternatives to US market dependence. Specific opportunities include German automotive and renewable energy technology, Dutch agricultural innovation and water management, French aerospace and nuclear technology, and Spanish renewable energy and infrastructure development experience.

Asia-Pacific partnerships provide manufacturing and innovation capabilities that complement European technology transfer. China’s Belt and Road Initiative offers infrastructure investment funding, while technology access in 5G, AI, renewable energy, and electric vehicles creates opportunities for joint development. However, these partnerships require careful management to avoid debt trap diplomacy through detailed contract negotiation and maintenance of technology sovereignty through joint ventures rather than pure dependence. Japan and South Korea provide advanced manufacturing expertise, precision engineering and automation technology, R&D collaboration opportunities, and quality standards that enhance Mexican manufacturing capabilities. India offers IT services, software development capabilities, pharmaceutical manufacturing expertise, and space technology development opportunities.

Latin American integration provides the foundation for regional leadership that reduces dependence on external powers. Enhanced Pacific Alliance cooperation among Mexico, Colombia, Peru, and Chile can coordinate regional value chains, share technology development, integrate financial systems, and provide coordinated approaches to external investment. Brazil-Argentina partnerships offer joint technology development in aerospace, energy, and agriculture, along with manufacturing integration opportunities and nuclear technology cooperation that leverage Mexico’s existing capabilities.

The key to successful international partnership lies in what Morelos anticipated in his warning against dependence on “any other nation, government or monarchy”—maintaining strategic autonomy while benefiting from international cooperation (Morelos, 1813). This requires limiting any single country’s share of trade and investment to below 45%, ensuring technology transfer in all foreign investment agreements, building domestic R&D capabilities in all strategic sectors, and developing alternative payment and financial systems that reduce dollar dependence.

Institutional Framework for Transformation#

The success of Mexico’s transformation depends on institutional innovations that combine developmental state capacity with democratic accountability. Following Evans (1995) and Wade (1990), Mexico requires strong state capacity to coordinate strategic investment and technology acquisition while maintaining market mechanisms for efficiency and innovation. This necessitates the creation of new institutions designed specifically for transformation rather than attempting to reform existing captured institutions.

A National Sovereignty Council comprising the President, Foreign Minister, Defense, Economy, Energy, and Technology ministers would coordinate strategic autonomy policies across all sectors, with powers to override market decisions when national security is at stake and a mandate to ensure no single country controls more than 30% of any critical sector. This council would operate alongside an enhanced Mexican Development Bank with $50 billion initial capitalization from oil revenues and international partners, focused on financing strategic technology development and infrastructure while giving preference to Mexican companies and joint ventures that include significant technology transfer.

A Technology Transfer and Innovation Council would ensure all foreign investment includes significant technology transfer, maintain powers to veto foreign acquisitions that don’t provide technology benefits, support domestic R&D and technology commercialization, and coordinate with friendly countries on technology sharing agreements. These institutions would operate within Mexico’s democratic framework while providing the coordination capacity necessary for complex transformation processes.

The institutional framework must also address the challenge of implementation in states where criminal organizations exercise significant influence. This requires creating what might be termed “clean zones”—geographic concentrations of reform activity where clean leaders can operate with enhanced protection and international support. These zones would feature comprehensive security arrangements similar to those used successfully in Colombia and Italy, combined with economic incentives so attractive that they demonstrate the superiority of legitimate over criminal economic activity.

Economic Impact and Social Transformation#

The quantified projections for Mexico’s transformation are based on comparative analysis of successful development cases adjusted for Mexico’s larger scale and resource advantages. The proposed $200 billion investment program over 15 years represents only 12% of Mexico’s current $1.7 trillion GDP, demonstrating feasibility given appropriate fiscal and monetary policies. The investment would generate 750,000+ new high-technology jobs with international career paths, increase GDP by 60-80% over 12 years through diversified growth, and create technology exports worth $80+ billion annually to diversified markets.

More fundamentally, the transformation would achieve trade diversification that reduces US export dependence from 80% to 45%, with Asia accounting for 25%, Europe 20%, and Latin America 10% of total trade. This diversification would be accompanied by investment diversification ensuring no single country accounts for more than 40% of foreign direct investment, energy security achieving 95% renewable energy by 2035 with export capability, and food security maintaining 100% food independence with export surplus.

The social transformation would be equally dramatic. Educated professional salaries would increase by 400-600% with international opportunities, while 60% of the workforce would gain international certifications or experience. Language capabilities would expand to 80% Spanish-English bilingual population with 40% possessing third language skills, creating global competency that positions Mexican workers for international careers. Regional development would reduce inequality between states by 50%, while corruption perception improvements would move Mexico from the bottom third to top third globally.

Perhaps most importantly, the transformation would create cultural confidence that values Mexican innovation and global engagement, combined with regional leadership that positions Mexico as the technology hub for Latin America. This cultural transformation addresses what Morelos understood as fundamental to sustainable change: the need for citizens to prosper through “work and good customs” rather than exploitation and corruption, creating social structures that reinforce rather than undermine legitimate authority.

The Stakes: National Survival or Global Leadership#

The choice Mexico faces transcends mere economic policy—it represents a fundamental decision about national identity and global position in the 21st century. The path of continued dependence on the United States, accommodation with criminal networks, and acceptance of semi-peripheral status represents the path of least resistance but leads to permanent subordination and internal degradation. Mexican professionals will continue emigrating for better opportunities elsewhere, talented individuals will find criminal cooperation more rewarding than honest work, and the nation will remain subject to external manipulation by volatile leadership like the Trump administration.

The alternative path—strategic autonomy through diversified partnerships, technology-driven development, and regional leadership—requires substantial investment and political courage but offers the possibility of fulfilling Morelos' vision of genuine sovereignty. This path would position Mexico as a technology leader that exports innovation globally, achieve sufficient economic diversification to resist external pressure, create prosperity that makes criminal alternatives economically irrational, and establish Mexico as a bridge between regions and leader in Latin America.

The historical precedents demonstrate that such transformation is possible. South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore all achieved developed-country status within 30 years through strategic use of natural advantages combined with technology and education. China’s more recent experience shows that large developing countries can achieve rapid development and global influence with appropriate strategy, institutions, and long-term commitment. Mexico possesses greater natural resource diversity, superior geographic position, larger domestic markets, and stronger democratic foundations than any of these success stories.

What Mexico requires is what Morelos called for two centuries ago: leadership that understands the relationship between economic structures and political sovereignty, institutions capable of coordinating complex development processes while maintaining democratic accountability, and cultural transformation that values innovation and education alongside traditional strengths. Most fundamentally, Mexico needs what Gramsci (1971) termed “transformismo”—the creation of new hegemonic arrangements that make progressive change appear natural and inevitable rather than imposed.

Conclusion: The Path to Dignity and Sovereignty#

The analysis presented here demonstrates that Mexico possesses the natural resources, human capital, geographic advantages, and institutional foundations necessary to achieve rapid development and regional leadership within two decades. The state-by-state framework provides concrete mechanisms for leveraging these advantages through technology-driven development and diversified international partnerships. The Chinese development model offers valuable lessons while Mexico’s democratic foundations provide distinct competitive advantages for long-term sustainability.

Most fundamentally, this analysis validates Morelos’ insight that true independence requires not merely political autonomy but economic and social transformation that serves citizen welfare rather than external or criminal interests. The “second independence” proposed here—from poverty, inequality, foreign domination, and internal capture—represents the logical fulfillment of the sovereignty project initiated two centuries ago.

The transformation described requires what Morelos envisioned: effective governance that combines institutional separation with coordination toward common objectives, economic policies that provide citizens with opportunities to prosper through legitimate work, and social arrangements based on merit and virtue rather than inherited privilege or criminal power. Contemporary Mexico has the opportunity to achieve what Morelos could only imagine: a society where technological innovation creates sustainable prosperity, international engagement occurs from a position of strength rather than dependence, and economic structures serve the Mexican people rather than external powers or criminal networks.

The question before Mexico is whether its leaders possess the vision and courage to seize this historic opportunity. The path to dignity, prosperity, and sovereignty lies through the strategic autonomy that Morelos envisioned and that contemporary conditions make possible. The choice is between continued peripheral status in a world order designed by others or emergence as a regional great power that shapes global development in the 21st century.

As Morelos declared, the nation should ask citizens for nothing “but work and good customs”—a vision of society based on productive labor and ethical conduct rather than exploitation and corruption (Morelos, 1813). The framework presented here provides the roadmap for achieving this vision; implementation requires only the political will to choose sovereignty over subordination and progress over stagnation. Mexico’s second independence awaits not external permission but internal commitment to the transformation that its people deserve and its potential demands.

Glossary#

Acronyms and Abbreviations#

ECLAC - Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean United Nations organization that studies economic development in Latin America.

EU - European Union Economic and political union of 27 European countries.

R&D - Research and Development Activities to create new products, technologies or improve existing ones.

AI - Artificial Intelligence Technology that enables machines to “think” and make decisions like humans.

INEGI - National Institute of Statistics and Geography Mexican organization that collects data on population, economy and territory.

MW - Megawatts Unit of measurement for electrical energy. One megawatt can supply approximately 750 homes.

OECD - Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Group of 38 developed countries working together on economic issues.

GDP - Gross Domestic Product The total value of everything a country produces in a year (goods and services).

SENER - Ministry of Energy Mexican ministry in charge of the country’s energy policy.

IT - Information Technology Everything related to computers, software, internet and digital systems.

US - United States Mexico’s northern neighbor country.

USMCA - United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Trade agreement between these three countries (replaced NAFTA).

Economic Terms#

Strategic autonomy A country’s ability to make its own economic decisions without depending too much on other countries.

Value chains The different steps needed to create a product, from raw materials to the final consumer.

Geographic concentration When a country sells most of its products to a single country or region.

Asymmetric dependence When one country needs another country more than that other country needs it.

Autonomous development Economic growth that a country achieves by itself, without depending excessively on other countries.

Diversification Not putting “all eggs in one basket”; selling products to many different countries instead of just one.

Captured state When criminal or corrupt groups control government institutions for their benefit.

Developmental state A government that actively participates in planning and directing the country’s economic growth.

Structural heteronomy When a country cannot decide its own development path because it depends too much on others.

Technology hub A place where many technology companies and research centers are concentrated.

Resource curse When a country with many natural resources fails to develop because it becomes dependent on exporting them without processing.

Advanced manufacturing Production of goods using modern technology and highly skilled workers.

Middle powers Countries that are not superpowers but have enough power to influence their region.

Energy security When a country can meet its energy needs without depending on imports.

Technological sovereignty A country’s ability to develop and control its own important technologies.

Technology transfer When a foreign company shares its technical knowledge with local companies.

Special economic zone Geographic area with special rules to attract investment and development of certain sectors.

International Trade Concepts#

Exports Products that a country sells to other countries.

Imports Products that a country buys from other countries.

Foreign direct investment (FDI) Money that companies from other countries invest to build factories or operate businesses in Mexico.

Trade surplus When a country sells more than it buys abroad.

Comparative advantage What a country can produce better and cheaper than other countries.

Economic Indicators#

GDP growth How fast a country’s economy is growing each year.

GDP per capita GDP divided by the number of inhabitants; indicates how rich a population is on average.

Corruption Perceptions Index Rating that measures how corrupt people perceive their government to be (0=very corrupt, 100=very clean).

Economic Sectors#

Renewable energy Energy sources that don’t run out like sun, wind and water.

Industry 4.0 The new industrial revolution that uses robots, artificial intelligence and internet to automate production.

Critical minerals Metals and minerals essential for modern technologies like batteries and computers (examples: lithium, copper).

Tertiary sector Services like banking, tourism, education and technology (doesn’t produce physical goods).

References#

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Publishers.

Baker McKenzie. (2024). Mexico: Corruption Perceptions Index 2024. Baker McKenzie InsightPlus.

Baldwin, R. (2016). The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization. Harvard University Press.

Banco de México. (2023). Informe Anual 2023. Banco de México.

Bates, R. H. (2008). When Things Fell Apart: State Failure in Late-Century Africa. Cambridge University Press.

Brander, J. A., & Spencer, B. J. (1985). Export subsidies and international market share rivalry. Journal of International Economics, 18(1-2), 83-100.

Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2023). U.S. International Economic Accounts. U.S. Department of Commerce.

Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and Development in Latin America. University of California Press.

CEPAL. (2024). Critical Minerals for the Energy Transition and Electromobility. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.

Dos Santos, T. (1970). The structure of dependence. American Economic Review, 60(2), 231-236.

Energy Information Administration. (2023). International Energy Statistics. U.S. Department of Energy.

Evans, P. B. (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton University Press.

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers.

Frieden, J. A. (2020). The political economy of economic policy. Annual Review of Political Science, 23, 329-349.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. International Publishers.

Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., & Kaufmann, D. (2003). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture and influence in transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4), 751-773.

Hirschman, A. O. (1945). National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. University of California Press.

INEGI. (2024). Sistema de Cuentas Nacionales de México. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.

International Renewable Energy Agency. (2024). Mexico Renewable Energy Outlook. IRENA.

Keohane, R. O. (1969). Lilliputians’ dilemmas: Small states in international politics. International Organization, 23(2), 291-310.

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Little, Brown and Company.

Krasner, S. D. (1991). Global communications and national power: Life on the Pareto frontier. World Politics, 43(3), 336-366.

Krugman, P. R. (1986). Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics. MIT Press.

Kuik, C. C. (2008). The essence of hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s response to a rising China. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(2), 159-185.

Larsen, E. R. (2006). Escaping the resource curse and the Dutch disease? When and why Norway caught up with and forged ahead of its neighbors. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65(3), 605-640.

Lundvall, B. A. (Ed.). (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter Publishers.

MacroTrends. (2024). Mexico Trade to GDP Ratio 1960-2025. MacroTrends.

Mexican Institute for Competitiveness. (2023). The Economic Cost of Corruption and Violence in Mexico. IMCO.

Mining Journal. (2024). Mexico Silver Mining Investment Report 2024. Mining Journal.

Ministry of Finance. (2024). Sonora Lithium Reserves Valuation Report. Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público.

Morelos y Pavón, J. M. (1813). Sentimientos de la Nación. Congreso de Chilpancingo.

Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). National innovation systems: Why they are important, and how they might be measured and compared. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(1), 77-95.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press.

Prebisch, R. (1950). The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America.

Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (2001). The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review, 45(4-6), 827-838.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.

SENER. (2024). Renewable Energy Development Program 2024-2030. Secretaría de Energía.

Singer, H. W. (1950). The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. American Economic Review, 40(2), 473-485.

Statista. (2024). Key Economic Indicators of Mexico - Statistics & Facts. Statista.

Transparency International. (2024). Corruption Perceptions Index 2024. Transparency International.

UNCTAD. (2023). World Investment Report 2023. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of U.S. Enterprises. Basic Books.

Wade, R. (1990). Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton University Press.

Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Duke University Press.

World Bank. (2023). World Development Indicators. The World Bank Group.

Zakaria, F. (2008). The Post-American World. W. W. Norton & Company.